- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 4 months ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home › Forums › Software Testing Discussions › What Way Should Testing be Taught/Learned?
It occurred to me last week when reading about careers in testing that testing is a unique field in that qualifications are not necessary for a role in the field.
You can become a tester by just carrying out testing tasks.
It got me thinking; what is the best way for testing to be learned?
Do you think formal training is necessary or does on the job training work best for new testers to learn their role.
What are the advantages and disadvantages to either?
in my experience
– hands-on testing first, then more formalized training later.
– one domain first, then other domains later
I agree. Hands-on testing helps you learn a lot. I have also learned a lot testing alongside experienced testers.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.