Yup.. ‘coverage’ is a misleading word here 🙂
I think that post is referring mostly to scanning tools for actual code coverage. I am thinking more about how to manually plan a test suite against a complex product. Identifying where to focus your regression tests for best time spent and value.
Take, for example, the Google.com front page. It’s just one simple page so I could list all the elements to be ‘verified’
8 clickable links
1 searchbox
1 virtual keyboard popup
1 popup menu with 11 clickable icons
I want to know how other testers organise their thoughts when tackling a very complex product with 10s or 100s of pages/screens/options. Not for reports to management but to increase confidence in the product quality.
To play Devil’s Advocate … When I think about it, if I had a report that told me that 80% of the product had been verified (at a basic level) with regression tests then that information would at least point me to the 20% which needs consideration and possibly tests added.